Sharp v. Callahan et al

Filing 49

ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation 45 filed November 21, 2012, in its entirety. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 10 , 27 and 28 are Granted. Plaintiff's pro bono counsel's request for termination of appointment 41 is Granted. This proceeding is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed on 12/11/12 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (cp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON The Estate of MARJORY D. SHARP, by and through her Personal Representative, JEFFERY SHARP, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 6:12-cv-0605-TC v. CAROL CALLAHAN, OREGON CASCADES WEST COUNCIL of GOVERNMENTS, SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES, INDEPENDENCE HEALTH and REHABILITATION CENTER, ORDER Defendants. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on November 21, 2012, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and 1 - ORDER Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Plaintiff has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed November 21, 2012, in its entirety. #28) are GRANTED. Defendants' motions to dismiss (#10, #27, Plaintiff's pro bono counsel's request for termination of appointment (#41) is GRANTED. This proceeding is dismissed. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this I I J 2 - ORDER II day of December, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?