Elam v. Willamette Ear, Nose, Throat, and Facial Plastic Surgery, LLP

Filing 28

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 22 filed 10/5/12; Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 13 and Motion for Sanctions 15 are denied. Signed on 11/8/12 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (sln)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
TABATHA ELAM,
Plaintiff,
No. 6:12-cv-1260-TC
v.

ORDER
WILLAMETTE EAR, NOSE, THROAT,
AND PLASTIC SURGERY LLC.,
Defendant.
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Magistrate

Judge

Findings

and

Recommendation on October 5, 2012, in the above entitled case.

The

matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

and

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
a magistrate

judge's

Thomas

M.

Coffin

filed

§

636(b) (1) (B)

When either party objects to any portion of
Findings

and Recommendation,

the

district

court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
magistrate judge's report.

1

- ORDER

See 28 U.S.C.

§

636(b) (1); McDonnell

Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309,
1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied,

455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiff has filed objections.
of

Magistrate

Accordingly,

Judge

Coffin's

adopt

Magistrate

I

I have given de novo review

ruling.
Judge

I

find

Coffin's

no

error.

Findings

and

Recommendation filed October 5, 2012, denying the motions to remand
and for sanctions.

CONCLUSION
I adopt Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation
(#22)

filed October 5, 2012.

Plaintiff's motions to remand (#13)

and for imposition of sanctions

(#15) are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

~day

of November,

2012.

ANN AIKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

- ORDER