McKay v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Filing
26
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 24 . Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter. Signed on 07/10/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 2 page Order. (bb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
CLAUDIA SUE MCKAY,
Plaintiff,
6:12-CV-01926-AC
ORDER
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner, Social Security
Administration,1
Defendant.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and
Recommendation (#24) on June 4, 2014, in which he recommends the
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of
Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be
substituted for Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this case. No
further action need be taken to continue this case by reason of
the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 405. Procedure 72(b).
1
- ORDER
Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's
application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental
security income.
The matter is now before this Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and
Recommendation (#24).
Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the
Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 10th day of July, 2014.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2
- ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?