Bradley v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc. et al
Filing
9
ORDER: Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice 8 . Signed on 1/28/2013 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
Case 6:12-cv-01991-AA
Document 8-1
Filed 01/24/13
Page 1 of 2
Page ID#: 31
Jeremy Pyle (OSB ID 110157)
PRICE LAW GROUP
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
G. Thomas Martin, III (SBN 218456)
PRICE LAW GROUP
15760 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
Encino, CA 91436
T: (818) 907-2030; F: (818) 205-2730
jeremy@mpslawoffices.com
tom@plglawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
KAREN BRADLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
KAREN BRADLEY,
Case No.: 6:12-cv-01991-AA
Plaintiff,
--~~~~-] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
vs.
DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION
SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive,
Defendant.
WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION
SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1 through
10, inclusive,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims ofPlaintiffKaren
Bradley against Defendant Diversified Collection Services, Inc.; and Does 1 through 10,
inclusive, are dismissed, with prejudice. Plaintiff Karen Bradley and Defendant Diversified
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
3
Case 6:12-cv-01991-AA
Document 8-1
Filed 01/24/13
Page 2 of 2
Page ID#: 32
Collection Services, Inc.; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, shall each bear their own costs and
attorneys' fees.
JUDGE, United States District Court,
District of Oregon
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?