Leach v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 18

ORDER: For Attorney Fees Pursuant to EAJA 17 . Signed on 06/19/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)

Download PDF
Drew L. Johnson Kathryn Tassinari twood@callatg.com kathrynt50@comcast.net 1700 Valley River Drive Eugene, OR 97401 (54!) 434-6466 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON DON W. LEACH, Civil No. 6: 13-CV-00426-BR Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA vs. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay the sum of $4915.58 in attorney fees and expenses of$20.91 (Service costs), for a total of $4936.49, upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff,_ U.S._, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA awards fees subject "to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts") for full settlement of 1 -ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA all claims for fees under EAJA. Costs for court filing-fees shall be awarded to Plaintiff attorney in the sum of$350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920. If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, payment of $4915.58 in attorney fees, $20.91 in costs plus $350.00 reimbursement of Court filing-fees shall be made to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out ·to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel's office at the address provided above. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of June 4--,2014 PRESENTED BY: By: U~udge lsi DREW L. JOHNSON Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 2- ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?