Gill v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation 20 . Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter. Signed on 01/08/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PATRICIA RAE GILL, Plaintiff, 6:13-CV-01517-JE ORDER v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#20) on September 24, 2015, in which he recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 - ORDER When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). In her Objections Plaintiff reiterates the arguments contained in her Opening Brief and Reply. This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#20). Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of January, 2015. /s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?