Gill v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Filing
27
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation 20 . Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter. Signed on 01/08/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PATRICIA RAE GILL,
Plaintiff,
6:13-CV-01517-JE
ORDER
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner, Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and
Recommendation (#20) on September 24, 2015, in which he
recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying
Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits.
Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and
Recommendation.
The matter is now before this Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
report.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561
F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc).
In her Objections Plaintiff reiterates the arguments
contained in her Opening Brief and Reply.
This Court has
carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do
not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation.
The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record
de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's
Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and
Recommendation (#20).
Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the
Commissioner's decision and DISMISSES this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 8th day of January, 2015.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?