Hardy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 23

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 19 . The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this case is DISMISSED. See formal ORDER. Signed on 5/27/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TIMOTHY J. HARDY,

Case No. 6:13-cv-02287-TC

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
AIKEN, Judge:
On March 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings
and

Recommendation,

finding

that

the

Commissioner's

decision

denying disability benefits was supported by substantial evidence
in the record and recommending that the Commissioner's decision be
affirmed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C.

§

636(b) (1) (B)

and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
When

either party objects

to

any portion of a

magistrate

judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's
report.

See

28

U.S.C.

§

636(b) (1);

McDonnell

Douglas

Corp.

v.

Commodore Business Machines,
1981).

Plaintiff

Recommendation.

filed

Inc.,

timely

656 F.2d 1309, 1313

objections

I have, therefore,

to

the

(9th Cir.

Findings

and

given de novo review of Judge

Coffin's opinion, and I find no error.
Accordingly,

IT

IS

HEREBY

ORDERED

that

Magistrate

Judge

Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 19) filed March 6, 2015
is ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED and this
case is DISMISSED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this

~~y

of May, 2015.

Ann Aiken
United States District Judge