Serenity Lane v Netsmart Technologies, Inc., et al.

Filing 83

ORDER: Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation 81 is adopted and Plaintiff's First Claim for rescission in its First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. Signed on 4/13/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
SERENITY LANE, an Oregon corporation,
Plaintiff,

v.

Civ. No. 6:14-cv-00038-TC
ORDER

NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation, and SEQUEST
TECHNOLIGES, Inc., an Illinois corporation,
Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No.
81), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
Although plaintiff did not file objections, I reviewed the legal principles de nova. United States
v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is
correct. Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 81) is adopted and
Plaintiff's First Claim for rescission in its First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this _i}_ day of April, 2016.

Michael McShane
United States District Judge
I-ORDER