Smith v. US Federal Aviation Administration
Filing
60
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation 55 ) is adopted in full. Defendants motion for summary judgment 34 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment 38 and motion for supplemental disclosure 29 are DENIED. Plaintiffs motion for leave to respond 52 is GRANTED. This action is dismissed. Signed on 4/9/2015 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
STEVEN SMITH,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 6:14-cv-149-TC
v.
ORDER
U.S. FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
_____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No.
55), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Plaintiff filed objections to the report. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656
F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.
1 –ORDER
Magistrate Judge Coffin’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 55) is adopted in
full. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion
for summary judgment (ECF No. 38) and motion for supplemental disclosure (ECF No. 29) are
DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to respond (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED. This action is
dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 9th day of April, 2015.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________
Michael McShane
United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?