Ewbank v. Richardson et al
Filing
47
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation 44 filed November 12, 2014 is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment 17 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complai nt 22 is GRANTED with respect to a claim of retaliation. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint with 30 days from the date of this Order. Failure to do so will result is dismissal of this case. Amended Complaint is due 1/15/2015. Copy of order sent the Pro Se Plaintiff. Signed on 12/16/2014 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh) Modified typo on 12/17/2014 (jk).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
R. DRAKE EWBANK,
Case No.
6:14-cv-00612-TC
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
LIANE INKSTER RICHARDSON,
et al.,
Defendants.
Aiken, Chief Judge:
Magistrate Judge Coffin issued his Findings and Recommendation
in the above-captioned case on November 12, 2014, recommending that
defendants' motion to dismiss and for summary judgment be granted
but that plaintiff be allowed to amend his complaint with respect
to a claim of retaliation. The matter·is now before me. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636 (b) (1) (B)
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b). When either party objects
to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation,
the
1
district
- ORDER
court
must
make
a
de
novo
determination
of
that
portion
of
the
magistrate
judge's
report.
See
28
U.S.C.
§
636 (b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines,
Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.
Upon de novo review, I find no error with Magistrate Judge Coffin's
analysis.
Accordingly,
IT
IS
HEREBY
ORDERED
that
Magistrate
Judge
Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 44) filed November 12,
2014
is ADOPTED.
Defendants'
Motion to Dismiss and for
Summary
Judgment (doc. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File
Amended Complaint (doc. 22) is GRANTED with respect to a claim of
retaliation. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint with 30 days
from the
date
of this
Order.
Failure to do
dismissal of this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this
lh~
day of December, 2014.
United States District Judge
2
- ORDER
so will
result
is
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?