Allen v. T Mobile et al

Filing 9

Opinion and Order: This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EARL DEAN ALLEN,
Plaintiff,

Civ. No. 6:14-cv-01206-MC
OPINION AND ORDER

V.

T MOBILE, ATT, andVerizon,
Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge:
Plaintiff, prose, filed a complaint against T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon'on July 28,
2014. Pl.'s Compl. 1-5, ECF No. 1. On August 1, 2014, this Court issued an opinion dismissing
plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim. Order 1-3, ECF No. 6. In consideration of
plaintiffs pro se status, this Court granted plaintiff until September 2, 2014 "to file an amended
complaint c~ring the deficiencies identified." ld. at 3. 1 Plaintiffh~s not taken additional action
since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with this Court's order, ECF No.
6, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 5th day of September, 2014.

l_··
Michael J. McShane
United States District Judg~
1

The copy of this order (ECF No.6) sent to plaintiff was returned as "not deliverable as addressed." Mail Returned,
ECF No. 8; see also Local Rule 83-10 ("[E]very unrepresented party[] has a continuing responsibility to notify the
Clerk's Office whenever his or her mailing address, telephone number, and/or business e-mail address changes.''),

1 - OPINION AND ORDER