Boedigheimer v. Opel et al

Filing 43

OPINION AND ORDER: This Court ADOPTS Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, 41 , in full. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, 21 , is GRANTED. Signed on 6/17/15 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON . RICHARD LEWIS BOEDIGHEIMER, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:14-cv-01250-CL OPINION AND ORDER V. SGT. DAVE OPEL, et al., Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding prose, brings this action seeking damages for alleged violation ofthe Fourth and Eighth Amendments under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Report and Recommendation on May 22, 2015, in which he recommended that this Court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment on all claims. The matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Because no objections to the Report and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court reviews only the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon review, this Court finds no error in Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 41. 1 Plaintiffs claims arise out of an arrest that occurred on August 2, 2012. Following arrest, plaintiff was convicted by jury of Assaulting a Public Safety Officer, ORS § 163.208, Resisting Arrest, ORS § 162.315, and Disorderly Conduct in the Second Degree, ORS § 166.025. See Dec!. of Gerald Warren 32-35, ECF No. 24-1. 1 -OPINION AND ORDER CONCLUSION This Court ADOPTS Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 41, in full. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this {::::r day of June, 2015. \L-__.__ l - Michael J. McShane United States District Judge 2- OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?