Powell v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 25

ORDER: Granting Unopposed Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 23 . Based upon the Plaintiff's Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney's fees of $5443.86 and expenses $10.76 and costs of $14.35, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney's office. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)

Download PDF
LISA R. J. PORTER JP Law PC 5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (503) 245-6309 OSB NO. 025035 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Penny Lee Powell, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-01899-JE CAROLYN W. COLVIN COMMISSIONER of Social Security, Defendant ORDER GRANTING AWARD OF EAJA FEES, EXPENSES COSTS / ORDER Based upon the Plaintiff’s Petition, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) the assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney by Plaintiff, as discussed in Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521U.S. (2010), and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 it is hereby ordered that EAJA attorney’s fees of $5443.86 and expenses $10.76 and costs of $14.35, if not subject to any offset allowed under the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program as discussed in Ratliff shall be paid to the Plaintiff, and mailed to the attorney’s office. 18th Done this ______day of ________________, 2017. January /s/ John Jelderks __________________________________________ U.S. Magistrate Judge Presented by: s/Lisa R.J. Porter_____________Lisa R.J. Porter, OSB 025035 Attorney for Plaintiff 5200 SW Meadows Rd., Suite 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?