McFarland v. Eugene Police Department et al

Filing 30

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 26 . See formal ORDER. Copy of ORDER sent to Pro Se Plaintiff. Signed on 8/1/2016 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

JERRY DON MCFARLAND,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 6:15 CV 158-TC

v.
ORDER
EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 1, 2016.
The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No
objections have been timely filed, although the Plaintiff has failed to advise the court of his
current address resulting in return mail. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual
findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.
1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and
Recommendation.
of August, 2016.

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge
Order -- Page 1