Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

ORDER: Magistrate Judge Clarkes Findings and Recommendation 19 is adopted in full. The Commissioners decision is AFFIRMED. Signed on 4/18/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
REBECCA CROLYN SMITH,
Plaintiff,

6:15-cv-00383-CL
ORDER

v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
_____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 19),
and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the
file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore
Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is
correct.
1 –ORDER

In her objections to the Findings and Recommendation, plaintiff raises some objections
not presented to Judge Clarke. I decline to address those arguments. See B & K Livestock
Auction, Inc. v. Oregon Dep’t of Envtl. Quality, No. 3:12-CV-2085-PK, 2013 WL 3973880, at *2
(D. Or. July 31, 2013); Container Recovery, Inc. v. Shasta Nw, Inc., No. CV 05-1749-PK, 2007
WL 1724937, at *1 (D. Or. June 11, 2007); Aleck v. United States of America, CV 04-277-AS,
2005 WL 2709502 (D. Or. Oct. 21, 2005).
Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is adopted in
full. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 18th day of April, 2016.

_______/s/ Michael J. McShane________
Michael McShane
United States District Judge

2 –ORDER