Jacobson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 23

ORDER FOR REMAND. See formal ORDER FOR REMAND. Signed on 2/23/2016 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON TAMMY MARIE JACOBSON, Civil No. 6:15-CV-00532-AA Plaintiff, v. ORDER FOR REMAND CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner of Social Security's decision finding Plaintiff not disabled is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for fmiher administrative proceedings. 2. On remand, the Appeals Council shall instruct the Administrative Law Judge to reevaluate the medical source opinions ofrecord; reassess whether the claimant's medically determinable back impairments, mental impairments, and cognitive impairments are severe impaitments for at least 12 consecutive months during the period at issue; evaluate the claimant's mental impairment(s) in accordance with the special technique described in 20 CFR 404.1520a; assess the claimant's residual functional capacity and provide rationale for the assessment; and complete the sequential disability evaluation process. As necessary, the Administrative Law Judge should obtain medical expe1i testimony to clarify the nature and severity of the claimant's impairments. Page I ORDER- [6:15-CV-00532-AA] 3. Plaintiff will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon a timely and proper application to this Court. 4. The Court shall enter final judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this ~ '2016. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 United States Attorney JANICE E. HEBERT, La. Bar#20218 Assistant United States Attorney s/ Gerald J. Hill GERALD J. HILL Special Assistant U.S. Attorney of Attorneys for Defendant (206) 615-2274 Page 1 ORDER- [6:15-CV-00532-AA]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?