Fairbanks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
17
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 15 . Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the immediate calculation and award of benefits and DISMISSES the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/14/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EVA MARIE FAIRBANKS,
Plaintiff,
6:15-cv-02360-SB
ORDER
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued Findings and
Recommendation (#15) on January 23, 2017, in which she recommends
this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision denying
Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits from
October 4, 2012, through October 14, 2013, for the
calculation and award for benefits.
immediate
The matter is now before
this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1
ORDER
(
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge ' s Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed , this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de nova.
561 F.3d 930 ,
932 (9th Cir. 2009) .
See Dawson v . Marshall ,
See also United States v .
Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114 , 1121 (9th Cir . 2003) (en bane).
Having reviewed the legal principles de nova , the Court does not
find any erro r.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and
Recommendation (#15) .
Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the
decision of the Commissione r and REMANDS this matter pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C.
§
405(g) for th e immediate calculati on
and award of benefits and DISMISSES the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
(~
day of February , 20 1 7 .
ANNA J. BROWN
Un ited States District Judge
2
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?