Fairbanks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 17

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 15 . Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the immediate calculation and award of benefits and DISMISSES the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/14/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EVA MARIE FAIRBANKS, Plaintiff, 6:15-cv-02360-SB ORDER v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Stacie Beckerman issued Findings and Recommendation (#15) on January 23, 2017, in which she recommends this Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits from October 4, 2012, through October 14, 2013, for the calculation and award for benefits. immediate The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 ORDER ( Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge ' s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed , this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de nova. 561 F.3d 930 , 932 (9th Cir. 2009) . See Dawson v . Marshall , See also United States v . Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114 , 1121 (9th Cir . 2003) (en bane). Having reviewed the legal principles de nova , the Court does not find any erro r. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation (#15) . Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissione r and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for th e immediate calculati on and award of benefits and DISMISSES the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this (~ day of February , 20 1 7 . ANNA J. BROWN Un ited States District Judge 2 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?