Poston v Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 26

ORDER: Granting Motion for Attorney Fees 24 . Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Signed on 04/23/2019 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION PARIS RENE POSTON, Civ. No. 6:15-cv-02389-CL Plaintiff, ORDER V. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. CLARKE, Magistrate Judge. This case comes before the Court on an unopposed motion for attorney fees (#24) under ,, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiff is due a retroactive award of benefits in the amount of$210,257.00. A fee awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) cannot exceed 25% of the retroactive benefits. Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1147 (9th Cir. 2009). Plaintiffs counsel seeks an aggregate total attorney fee of $30,000, which is less that the statutorily permitted 25% of Plaintiffs retroactive benefits ($52,564.25), and accounts for a reduction of $5,007.28 in Equal Access to Justice (EAJA) fees already awarded, $6,000 in fees paid already pursuant to the fee agreement, and a voluntary reduction of $11,556.97. Having reviewed the proceedings and the amount of Page 1 ORDER fees sought, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's counsel is entitled to th~ $30,000 fee~ requested. Plaintiffs Motion (#24) is GRANTED. The agency is directed to issue the§ 406(b) check directly to Plaintiffs counsel in the amount of $30,000, minus any user fee. Any amount withheld after all administrative and attorney fees are paid should be released directly to Plaintiff. United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?