Pearce v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
26
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings andRecommendation 24 . Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS thedecision of the Commissioner and DISMISSES this matter pursuantto sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th day of July, 2017, by United States District Judge Anna J. Brown. (peg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
KYLE DEAN PEARCE,
Plaintiff,
6:16-cv-00021-AC
ORDER
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1
Acting Commissioner, Social
Security Administration,
Defendant.
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and
Recommendation (#24) on July 7, 2017, in which he recommends this
Court affirm the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's
application for supplemental security income benefits and
disability insurance benefits.
1
The matter is now before this
On January 23, 2017, Nancy A. Berryhill was appointed the
Acting Commissioner of Social Security and pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d) is substituted as the Defendant in
this action.
1
ORDER
Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§
636(b)(l)(B) and Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de novo.
561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not
find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and
Recommendation (#24).
Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the
decision of the Commissioner and DISMISSES this matter pursuant
to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.
§
405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
,,tv-._
DATED this a~
day of July, 2017.
ANNA~tf~
United States District Judge
2
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?