Clocksin et al v. Keystone Real Estate, Inc.
Filing
22
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees 18 is Granted in the amount of $14,787.50 and Plaintiff's Bill of Costs 21 is Granted and costs taxed in the amount of $583.56 against Defendant. Signed on 6/29/2016 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp) Modified docket entry document title to add "opinion" on 6/30/2016 (ljb).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
KRYSTLE CLOCKSIN, KYLE DAVIS,
and FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF
OREGON,
PlaintiffS,
Case No. 6:16-cv-00026-JR
OPINION AND ORDER ON
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY
FEES AND BILL OF COSTS
v.
KEYSTONE REAL ESTATE, INC.,
an Oregon corporation,
Defendants.
McShane, Judge:
Plaintiffs seek attorney fees in the amount of $14,787.50 and costs in the amount of
$583.56 following a Rule 55(b) default judgment granted in their favor against defendants. ECF
Nos. 18, 21. This Court awarded Plaintiff Clocksin $12,092.50 and Plaintiff Davis $11,899.50
and PlaintiffFHCO $15,226.00. ECF No. 17. The Court also awarded Plaintiffs reasonable
attorney fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c)(2), which gave rise to the petitions now
at issue. Id. I asses fees and costs for their reasonableness below.
I.
Motion for Attorney Fees
The Ninth Circuit applies the "lodestar" method for calculating attorney fees. Fischer v.
SJB-P. D. Inc., 214 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th Cir. 2000). That calculation multiplies a reasonable
hourly rate by the number of hours reasonably expended in the litigation. Id. (citing Hensley v.
Page 1 - OPINION AND ORDER
Eckerhart, 461U.S.424, 433, 103 S. Ct. 1933 (1983). The court then decides whether to
enhance or reduce the lodestar figure by evaluating a set of factors. Moreno v. City of
Sacramento, 534 F.3d 1106, 1111 (9th Cir. 2008). A "strong presumption" exists that the
lodestar figure represents a "reasonable fee," and it should therefore only be enhanced or reduced
in "rare and exceptional cases." Pennsylvania v. Del. Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 478
U.S. 546, 565, 106 S. Ct. 3088, 92 L. Ed. 2d 439 (1986).
Due to the fact that Plaintiffs' fee petition arises from a default judgment, it is effectively
uncontested. In determining the reasonableness of fees, however, this Court must nonetheless
provide a "concise but clear" explanation of reasons for the fee award. Gates v. Deukmajian, 987
F.2d 1392, 1400 (9th Cir. 1992). Plaintiffs' lead counsel spent 76.7 hours on this case at a rate of
$150. Plaintiffs' co-counsel spent 4.2 hours on this case at a rate of $250. ECF No. 8. These
figures appear consistent with prevailing market rates, which are those that the local legal market
would pay for a case of this nature to a lawyer of comparable skill, experience, and reputation to
a plaintiffs counsel ofrecord. Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 897, 104 S. Ct. 1541 (1984). 1
Plaintiffs' counsel attest that the hours billed were spent primarily on the investigation preceding
this action, the preparation and filing of the motions in this case, and preparation for argument
before this Court. Id at 2-3.
Plaintiffs' counsel assert that they exercised "conservative billing judgment, deleting
duplicative and non-essential time and refraining from seeking compensation for the time of a
third co-counsel or for consultation with additional Oregon Law Center attorneys." Pls.' Mot. for
1
Courts in this District have determined that they will use the Oregon State Bar 2012 Economic Survey as their
initial benchmark when reviewing fee petitions. The economic survey is available at
https://www .osbar.org/_ docs/resources/Econsurveys/ 12EconomicS urvey. pd£
Page 2 - OPINION AND ORDER
•
Atty. Fees, 3, ECF No. 18. Upon review, I agree with these assertions and I find both the hours
spent and the hourly rates applied to be reasonable under the circumstances.
II.
Bill of Costs
Plaintiffs Bill of Costs itemizes $400 in filing fee expenses, $112.50 in costs related to
service, and $71.06 in costs related to traveling to and from Eugene to appear in court, for a total
of $21,201.36. Upon review, these expenses appear reasonable and I grant them under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1920.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees, ECF No. 18, is
GRANTED in the amount of $14,787.50, and Plaintiffs Bill of Costs, ECF No. 21, is
GRANTED in the amount of $583.56.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this L°I day of June, 2016.
\
l1----
Michael McShane
United States District Judge
Page 3 - OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?