Crum v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 21 . Signed on 5/12/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)

Download PDF
Case 6:16-cv-00102-HZ Document 21-2 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 2 Drew L. Johnson Kathryn Tassinari 1700 Valley River Drive Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 434-6466 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON DONALD L. CRUM, Civil No. 6:16-cv-00102-HZ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ____________________________________ After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney the sum of $4872.40 upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA awards fees subject “to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts”) for full settlement of all claims for fees under EAJA. 1 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA Case 6:16-cv-00102-HZ Document 21-2 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 2 If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $4872.40 shall be made to Plaintiff’s attorney Drew L. Johnson and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of May _____, 2016 ______________________________ U.S. District Judge/Magistrate Judge PRESENTED BY: By: /s/ DREW L. JOHNSON Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?