Wilkins v. Peters et al
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 31 and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion 14 for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants' Motion 21 for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 7/25/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EARL DOUGLAS WILKINS,
COLETTE S. PETERS, et al.,
Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and
Recommendation (#31) on June 20, 2017, in which she recommends
the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Summary Judgment and
grant Defendants' Motion (#21) for Summary Judgment.
filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendation.
is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
636(b) (1) and
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de nova determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
See also Dawson v. Marshall,
(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections
and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings
The Court also has reviewed the pertinent
portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and
Recommendation (#31) and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion
for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#21)
for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 25th day of July, 2017.
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?