Wilkins v. Peters et al

Filing 37

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 31 and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion 14 for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants' Motion 21 for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 7/25/2017 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

EARL DOUGLAS WILKINS,
Plaintiff,

6:16-cv-00319-SB
ORDER

v.

COLETTE S. PETERS, et al.,
Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and
Recommendation (#31) on June 20, 2017, in which she recommends
the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion (#14) for Summary Judgment and
grant Defendants' Motion (#21) for Summary Judgment.

Plaintiff

filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

The matter

is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1 - ORDER

§

636(b) (1) and

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate
Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make
a de nova determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's
report.

28

F.3d 930,

u.s.c.

932

§

636(b)(l).

See also Dawson v. Marshall,

561

(9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328

F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections
and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings
and Recommendation.

The Court also has reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and
Recommendation (#31) and, therefore, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion
(#14)

for Summary Judgment and GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#21)

for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 25th day of July, 2017.

ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER