Breithaupt v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
ORDER: Granting Motion for Attorney Fees 20 . Signed on 7/22/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
RICHARD G. BREITHAUPT,
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Plaintiff Richard G. Breithaupt brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner's
final decision to deny Disability Insurance Benefits. On November 1, 2016, pursuant to the
parties’ stipulated motion, the Court reversed the Commissioner's decision and ordered that the
case be remanded for additional proceedings. Judgment was entered on January 19, 2017.
Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Pl. Mot., ECF 20.
Defendant has no objection to the request. Id. The Court has reviewed the record in the case, the
motion, and the supporting materials including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with
1 - ORDER
counsel, and the recitation of counsel's hours and services. Applying the standards set by
Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Court finds the requested fees reasonable.
The Court grants the motion  and awards Plaintiff's counsel $8,406.00 in attorney's
fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, the Court awarded Plaintiff attorney's fees in the
amount of $6,435.51 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. When
issuing the section 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney, the Commissioner is directed
to subtract the amount previously awarded under EAJA and send Plaintiff’s attorney the balance
of $1,970.49 less any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. Any amount withheld
after all administrative and court attorney's fees are paid should be released to the claimant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
day of _______________, 2019
Marco A. Hernandez
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?