Parks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 18

ORDER: Granting Stipulated Motion for Remand 17 . Signed on 2/23/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON JEANNA LYNN PARKS, Civil No. 6: 16-CV-00515-MC Plaintiff, V. ORDER FOR REMAND NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be reversed and remanded, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner will: • Update the record as necessary and hold a de novo hearing; • Further evaluate the opinions of Douglas McMahon, D.O., and explain the weight afforded to his opinions supported by the evidence of record; • If necessary, obtain additional evidence in the form of a consultative examiner and/or call a medical expert to testify as to the nature and severity of the claimant's impairments; • Further evaluate the claimant's maximum residual functional capacity and, in doing so, re-evaluate the claimant's symptoms in accordance with Social Security Ruling 16-3p; • If necessary, consider transferable skills with supplemental vocational expert evidence, as well as a nonmechanical application of the grid rules in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1563(b ); and • Issue a new decision. Page 1 ORDER - [6: l 6-CV-00515-MC] The claimant shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2. ~ day of _ _:_,~cb _ _ _ _ , 2017. __ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 United States Attorney JANICE E. HEBERT, La. Bar #20218 Assistant United States Attorney s/ Alexis L. Toma ALEXIS L. TOMA Special Assistant U.S. Attorney of Attorneys for Defendant (206) 615-2950 Page 1 ORDER - [6: l 6-CV-00515-MC]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?