Parks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER: Granting Stipulated Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 20 . Signed on 4/13/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

Download PDF
Case 6:16-cv-00515-MC Document 20-2 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1of2 John E. Haapala, Jr. OSB 061739 401 E. 101h Ave., Ste. 240 Eugene, OR 97401 Ph: 541-345-84 74 Fax: 541-345-3237 jeh@haapalaw.com Of attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CARMELO A. PARKS, Case No. 6:16-cv-00515-MC Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT Defendant. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of $6,824.52 shall be awarded to Plaintiff. The parties agree that this award will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the award, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff ,560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then a check shall be made to Plaintiffs attorney, and mailed directly to Plaintiff's attorney at: 401 E. 101h Ave., Ste. 240, Eugene, OR 1 -ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT Case 6:16-cv-00515-MC Document 20-2 Filed 04/10/17 Page 2 of 2 97401. If Plaintiff has a debt, then a check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office. There are no other costs or expenses to be paid herein. Dated this _!]_of April, 2017. l L--- United States District Judge/Magistrate Submitted by: John E Haapala, OSB 061739 401 E. 101h Ave., Ste. 240 Eugene, OR 97401 Attorney for Plaintiff 2 - ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?