Parks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
21
ORDER: Granting Stipulated Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 20 . Signed on 4/13/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
Case 6:16-cv-00515-MC
Document 20-2
Filed 04/10/17
Page 1of2
John E. Haapala, Jr.
OSB 061739
401 E. 101h Ave., Ste. 240
Eugene, OR 97401
Ph: 541-345-84 74
Fax: 541-345-3237
jeh@haapalaw.com
Of attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
CARMELO A. PARKS,
Case No. 6:16-cv-00515-MC
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Commissioner, Social Security
Administration,
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT
Defendant.
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant
to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 2412, an attorney fee in the amount of
$6,824.52 shall be awarded to Plaintiff.
The parties agree that this award will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent
upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the award,
pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff ,560 U.S. 586
(2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then a check shall be made to Plaintiffs attorney,
and mailed directly to Plaintiff's attorney at: 401 E. 101h Ave., Ste. 240, Eugene, OR
1 -ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT
Case 6:16-cv-00515-MC
Document 20-2
Filed 04/10/17
Page 2 of 2
97401. If Plaintiff has a debt, then a check for any remaining funds after offset of the
debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office.
There are no other costs or expenses to be paid herein.
Dated this _!]_of April, 2017.
l
L---
United States District Judge/Magistrate
Submitted by:
John E Haapala, OSB 061739
401 E. 101h Ave., Ste. 240
Eugene, OR 97401
Attorney for Plaintiff
2 - ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?