Pilant v. Ditech Financial LLC et al

Filing 28

ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss 22 is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Defendant's Motion to Compel and for Monetary Sanctions 20 is denied. Signed on 10/3/2017 by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin. (plb)

...

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
6: 16-CV-00555-TC

RANDY PILANT
Plaintiff,

ORDER

V.

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, and Does 1-50,
Defendants.
COFFIN, Magistrate Judge:
Defendant filed a motion (#20) to compel and for monetary sanctions. Pro se plaintiff
responded with a motion to voluntarily dismiss the action with prejudice. The latter motion is
allowed. The motion to compel is denied as moot and the motion for monetary sanctions is denied
as an award of monetary sanctions in the circumstances of this case would be unjust, especially in
light of the voluntary dismissal with prejudice ..

Page 1 - ORDER

..

Conclusion

Plaintiffs motion (#22) to voluntarily dismiss is allowed and this action is dismissed with
prejudice. Defendant's motion (#20) to compel and for monetary sanctions is denied.

DATED this

United States

Page 2 - ORDER

S

day of October, 2017 .