Mowdy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
26
ORDER. Signed on 6/11/2020 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
Max Rae
OSB No. 813448
maxrae.atty@comcast.net
P.O. Box 7790
Salem, OR 97303
(503) 363-5424
Fax: (503) 363-5460
Attorney for Plaintiff, Johnny R. Mowdy
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
JOHNNY R. MOWDY,
Plaintiff,
6:16-cv-00842-YY
v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
ORDER
Attorney’s fees in the amount of $25,556.75 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff’s attorney
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court finds this is a reasonable fee.
Previously, this court awarded fees pursuant to the Equal Access To Justice Act (EAJA),
28 U.S.C. § 2412. For work performed herein, Plaintiff was awarded Equal Access To Justice
Act attorney’s fees, in the amount of $8,271.47. (Docket # 24). However, the U.S. Treasury
applied $1,973 of that award to Plaintiff’s child support debt. Plaintiff’s attorney received the
net: $6,298.47. In a prior federal court case, Plaintiff’s attorney received $3,371.03 in EAJA
fees. (Case no. 6:10-cv-06063-HO Docket #21, March 23, 2011). In combination, Plaintiff’s
attorney received $9,669.50 in EAJA attorney fees.
When issuing the § 406(b) check, the agency is directed to subtract the amount of the
EAJA fee previously received by the attorney and to send to Plaintiff’s attorney, Max Rae, at the
ORDER – MOWDY v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 6:16-cv00842-YY
address above, the balance of $15,887.25, minus any user fee. Any amount withheld after all
administrative and court attorneys fees are paid should be released to the claimant.
June
11th
DATED this ____ day of ________________, 2020.
__________________________________________
/s/ Youlee Yim You
Youlee Yim You
United States Magistrate Judge
Presented by:
Max Rae, OSB 813448
(503) 363-5424
Attorney for Plaintiff, Johnny R. Mowdy
ORDER – MOWDY v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 6:16-cv00842-YY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?