Summit v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 20 . Signed on 8/28/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

Download PDF
1N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION ROBYN L. SUMMIT, Case No. 6:16-cv-01193-SU ORDER Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. AIKEN, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Sullivan filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on 7/13/2017 (doc. 20). The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de nova determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business i\1achines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). PAGE I -ORDER Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 25), and the Commissioner has filed a response (doc. 26). Thus, I review the F&R de nova. I find no enor and concur with Magistrate Judge Sullivan's thorough analysis of the factual and legal issues in this case. Therefore, I adopt Magistrate Judge Sullivan's F&R (doc. 20) in its entirety. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 2.:t1ay of August, 2011: Ann Aiken United States District Judge PAGE2-0RDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?