Davis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
20
ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 19 . Signed on 07/11/2017 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
Sherwood J. Reese
Sherwood.reese@comcast.net
Drew L. Johnson, P.C.
sherwoodreese@comcast.net
1700 Valley River Drive
Eugene, OR 97401
(541) 434-6466
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
JUDY L. DAVIS,
Civil No. 6:16-cv-01465-CL
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO EAJA
vs.
Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby
grants that Commissioner shall pay the sum of $8574.26 in attorney fees and expenses of $22.08
(Service), for a total of $8596.34, upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government
which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA awards fees subject "to a federal
administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts") for full settlement of all
1 - ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA
claims for fees under EAJA. Costs for court filing-fees shall be awarded to Plaintiff attorney in
the sum of $400.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1920.
If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, payment of $857 4 .26 in attorney fees, $22 .08
in costs plus $400.00 reimbursement of Court filing-fees shall be made to Plaintiff's attorney
Drew L. Johnson and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If
Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to
Plaintiff and mailed to counsel's office at the address provided above.
IT IS SO ORDERED this day of July
_L(__, 2017
PRESENTED BY:
By:
/s/ SHERWOOD J. REESE
Sherwood J. Reese, OSB #144130
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
2 -ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?