Nees v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 23

ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 22 . Signed on 12/12/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

Download PDF
Drew L. Johnson Kathryn Tassinari sherwoodreese@comcast.net katht:ynt50@comcast.net 1700 Valley River Drive Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 434-6466 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CAROLANN M. NEES, Civil No. 6:16-cv-02047-AA Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA vs. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay the sum of $3691.84 in attorney fees and expenses of$22.08 (Service), for a total of $3713.92, upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in As true v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (BAJA awards fees subject "to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts") for full settlement of all 1 - ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO BAJA claims for fees under EAJA. Costs for court filing-fees shall be awarded to Plaintiff attorney in the sum of$400.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง1920. If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, payment of $3691.84 in attorney fees, $22.08 in costs plus $400.00 reimbursement of Court filing-fees shall be made to Plaintiff's attorney Drew L. Johnson and mailed to his office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel's office at the address provided above. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of December /.2.., , 2017 U.S. District Judge/Magistrate Judge PRESENTED BY: By: Isl DREW L. JOHNSON Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 2- ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO BAJA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?