Reuter v. Noridian Mutual Insurance Company
Opinion and Order: Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to comply with the Courts order 19 , this action is dismissed. Signed on 3/1/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (cp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Civ. No. 6:16-cv-02243-MC
OPINION AND ORDER
NORIDIAN MUTUAL INSURANCE
Plaintiff pro se filed his original complaint on October 7, 2016 in Lane County state court
and was subsequently removed to federal court. Notice of Removal Ex. A, ECF No. 1. On
January 12, 2017, this Court issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for failing to allege
facts sufficient to raise a right of relief. Order, ECF No. 19. In consideration of plaintiff’s pro se
status, this Court granted plaintiff until February 12, 2017 “to file an amended complaint curing
the deficiencies identified.” Id. at 3. The Court also offered to provide plaintiff with pro bono
counsel for purposes of a consultation on how best to proceed along with contact information. Id.
1 – OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff has not taken additional action since that time. Accordingly, because plaintiff failed to
comply with the Court’s order (ECF No. 19), this action is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 1st day of March, 2017.
____/s/Michael J. McShane_____
Michael J. McShane
United States District Judge
2 – OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?