Cunningham v. Davidson et al
Filing
26
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment and Order (ECF 19 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF 20 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Stay (ECF 22 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed on 9/1/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
BRADLY CUNNINGHAM,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 6:17-cv-109-SI
ORDER
v.
MELISSA DAVIDSON, an individual;
MICHELLE DODSON, an individual;
DENISE FJORDBECK, an individual; and
JANE OR JOHN DOES 1-20; all in their
individual capacities
Defendants.
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bradly Cunningham is a prisoner presently incarcerated at the Oregon State
Penitentiary. On January 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint against the named
defendants, bringing claims under 28 U.S.C. §1983, alleging theft of his property. ECF 2. On
August 7, 2017, Defendants filed an answer to the complaint. ECF 17. On August 16, 2017,
Plaintiff filed a motion requesting entry of default against Defendants and a judgment for money
damages. ECF 19. On August 18, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a
claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). ECF 20. Also on August 18, 2017, Defendants filed a
motion to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss. ECF 22.
PAGE 1 – ORDER
Entry of default and default judgment is proper only when a party against whom
judgment is sought has failed to plead or defend their case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Because
Defendants timely answered Plaintiff’s complaint, entry of default is not proper. A motion to
dismiss for failure to state a claim must “be made before pleading if a responsive pleading is
allowed.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure include answers to
complaints in the definition of a pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Because Defendants filed their
answer before filing their motion to dismiss, they waived their opportunity to file a motion to
dismiss. See Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Alla Med. Services, Inc., 855 F.2d 1470, 1474 (9th Cir. 1988)
(holding that a motion under Rule 12(b) must be made before pleading if a pleading is
permitted).
Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment and Order (ECF 19) is DENIED. Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (ECF 20) is DENIED. Defendants’ Motion to Stay (ECF 22) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 1st day of September, 2017.
/s/ Michael H. Simon
Michael H. Simon
United States District Judge
PAGE 2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?