Gregory v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 22 . The Commissioner's final decision denying Mr. Gregory's application for disability insurance benefits and social security insurance is Affirmed. Signed on 4/26/18 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
DANIEL GENE GREGORY,
Plaintiff,
No. 6:17-cv-00167-PK
ORDER
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [22] on March 12,
2018, in which he recommends that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s final decision denying
Mr. Gregory’s application for disability insurance benefits and social security insurance.
Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
1 – ORDER
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings & Recommendation [22].
Accordingly, the Commissioner’s final decision denying Mr. Gregory’s application for disability
insurance benefits and social security insurance is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2018.
____________________________________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?