Ewbank v. Emerick et al

Filing 84

ORDER: Adopting Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation 78 in full. Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Amend 75 us denied. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file a fifth amended complaint is denied as moot. Signed on 10/15/2018 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ROBERT DRAKE EWBANK,
Case No. 6:17-cv-00187-MK
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
JEFF EMRICK, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo filed a Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 78, and
the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed
objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed this case de
novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.,
656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and adopt the Findings and
Recommendations.

1 –ORDER

Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF No. 78, is ADOPTED in
full. Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion to Amend, ECF No. 75 is DENIED. Plaintiff’s Motion for
leave to file a Fifth Amended Complaint is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 15th day of October, 2018.

/s/ Michael McShane
Michael McShane
United States District Judge

2 –ORDER