Shipp v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 31

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation 28 . Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for an award of benefits. Signed on 9/1/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jtj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BRENDA S., No. 6:17-cv-00393-JE Plaintiff, ORDER v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation [28] on June 24, 2019, in which he recommends that the Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this case for an award of benefits. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 - ORDER Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks’s Findings and Recommendation [28]. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for an award of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of ________________, 2019 MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?