United States of America v. $20,000.00 in US Currency

Filing 7

DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE. Signed on 6/5/2017 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (ps2)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:17-cv-00398-MA v. $20,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, in rem, DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE Defendant. Based upon the Government's Motion for Entry of a Default Judgment of Forfeiture, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, in rem, $20,000.00 in U.S. currency, and all persons claiming any right, title, or interest in or to this Defendant, are in default for want of claim, answer, or other response or pleading, and such default is entered pursuant to Rule SS(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that based upon such default and the records in this action, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction and Defendant $20,000.00 in U.S. currency, in rem, is condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, free and clear of the claims of any and all persons, including, Laura Guijarro-Romero, Amadeo Gomez-Villanueva, and Jose M. Garcia, claiming any right, title, or interest in or to the Defendant currency. The Drug Enforcement Default Judgment of Forfeiture Page 1 Agency (DEA) is directed to immediately transfer the custody and possession of Defendant, in rem, $20,000.00 in U.S. currency, to the United States Marshals Service for disposition in accordance with applicable statutes and regulations and provisions of this judgment. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorney fees incurred in prosecuting and defending this action. DATED this _j[_ day of June, 2017. MALCOLM F. MARSH United States District Judge Respectfully submitted, BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 United States Attorney STEVEN T. MYGRANT, OSB #031293 Assistant United States Attorney (503) 727-1052 Default Judgment of Forfeiture Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?