United States of America v. $20,000.00 in US Currency
Filing
7
DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE. Signed on 6/5/2017 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (ps2)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 6:17-cv-00398-MA
v.
$20,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
in rem,
DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF
FORFEITURE
Defendant.
Based upon the Government's Motion for Entry of a Default Judgment of Forfeiture,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, in rem, $20,000.00 in U.S.
currency, and all persons claiming any right, title, or interest in or to this Defendant, are in
default for want of claim, answer, or other response or pleading, and such default is entered
pursuant to Rule SS(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that based upon such default and the records in this action,
this Court has subject matter jurisdiction and Defendant $20,000.00 in U.S. currency, in rem, is
condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, free and clear of the claims of any and
all persons, including, Laura Guijarro-Romero, Amadeo Gomez-Villanueva, and Jose M. Garcia,
claiming any right, title, or interest in or to the Defendant currency. The Drug Enforcement
Default Judgment of Forfeiture
Page 1
Agency (DEA) is directed to immediately transfer the custody and possession of Defendant, in
rem, $20,000.00 in U.S. currency, to the United States Marshals Service for disposition in
accordance with applicable statutes and regulations and provisions of this judgment.
The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorney fees incurred in prosecuting and
defending this action.
DATED this _j[_ day of June, 2017.
MALCOLM F. MARSH
United States District Judge
Respectfully submitted,
BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366
United States Attorney
STEVEN T. MYGRANT, OSB #031293
Assistant United States Attorney
(503) 727-1052
Default Judgment of Forfeiture
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?