Bellah v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 23

ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 22 . Please access entire text by document number hyperlink. Signed on 04/03/2017 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)

Download PDF
Sherwood J. Reese Sherwood. reese@comcast.net Drew L. Johnson, P. C. sherwoodreese@comcast.net 1700 Valley River Drive Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 434-6466 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON DALE RAY BELLAH, Civil No. 6:17-CV-00613-CL Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA VS. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney the sum of $9500.00 upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA awards fees subject "to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts") for full settlement of all claims for fees under EAJA. If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $9500.00 shall be made to Plaintiff's attorneys, Drew L. Johnson, PC, and mailed to their office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, 1-0RDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel's office at the address IT IS SO ORDERED this day of April provided~ ./~ J ,2018_. / / / ·.. ... ·.~.-,, --, ..........-·· _.- ,,, / ,../ /,./,,,,,,, ... / L- · U.S. Qistrlct Judge/Magistrate Judge PRESENTED BY: By: /s/ DREW L. JOHNSON Drew L. Johnson, OSB 1175200 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff 2-0RDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?