Walburn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 18

ORDER. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation 16 . Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 10/24/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pvh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION KEVIN W.,1 No. 6:17-cv-1181-YY Plaintiff, ORDER v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] on August 14, 2018 in which she recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the nongovernmental party or parties in this case. 1 - ORDER Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [16]. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of ___________________, 2018. MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?