Ferguson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 21

OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge Beckerman's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 19 as my own opinion. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for the award of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/17/2019 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (gw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION GERALD L. F., 1 Plaintiff, No. 6:17-cv-01341-SB V. OPINION AND ORDER NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MOSMAN,J., On December 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued her Findings and Recommendation (F&R) [19], recommending that the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED and this case REMANDED for the award of benefits. Neither party filed objections to the F&R. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The comi is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the repmi or specified findings or 1 In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the nongovernmental party in this case. 1 - OPINION AND ORDER recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). CONCLUSION Upon review, I agree with Judge Becke1man's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [19] as my own opinion. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for the award of benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this _L_taay of January, 2019. MICHAEL W. ,M SMAN Chief United St s District Judge 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?