Creekmore v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
31
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 29 . Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 11th day of March, 2019, by United States District Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (peg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
LEAH C.,1
No. 6:17-cv-1443-AC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [29] on December 20,
2018, in which he recommends the Court reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand for
1
In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the nongovernmental party or parties in this case.
1 - ORDER
further administrative proceedings. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [29].
Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further
administrative proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of ___________________, 2019.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?