Bray v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation 15 . Therefore, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/29/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION

STARLYN B.,1
Plaintiff,

Case No. 6:17-cv-01897-SU
ORDER

v.
COMMISSIONER,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [15] on March 22,
2019, in which she recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision to deny Plaintiff’s
application for benefits. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1

In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the nongovernmental party or parties in this case.

1 - ORDER

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the
Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that the
objections do not provide a basis to modify the recommendation. The Court has also reviewed
the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings
and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings and Recommendation [15].
Therefore, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this case is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this

day of ____________________, 2019.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER