Christianson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 25

ORDER signed on 1/19/2022 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai GRANTING the parties' Stipulated Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 23 . (jk)

Download PDF
Case 6:20-cv-01003-MK Document 25 Filed 01/19/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CONRAD CHRISTIANSON, Plaintiff, 6:20-cv-01003-MK vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $4,512.14 and costs for filing fees in the amount of $400 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees and costs, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the fees shall be delivered via electronic funds transfer or by check made out to Plaintiff’s attorney and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office1 as follows: NW Disability benefits, LLC dba Kerr Robichaux & Carroll (TID 85-3999428), P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and sent via electronic funds transfer or by check mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. DATED this 19th day of January 2022. s/ Mustafa T. Kasubhai MUSTAFA T. KASUBHAI (He / Him) United States Magistrate Judge 1 Formerly known as Schneider Kerr & Robichaux. Case 6:20-cv-01003-MK Submitted by: Kevin Kerr, OSB #080934 kevin.kerr@nwdisabilitybenefits.com Kerr Robichaux & Carroll PO Box 14490 Portland, Oregon 97293 Phone: 503-255-9092 Fax: 503-255-9145 Attorney for Plaintiff Document 25 Filed 01/19/22 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?