Howell v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
13
ORDER FOR REMAND. Signed on 8/29/2024 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
SANDRA HOWELL,
Civil No. 6:24-cv-00154-YY
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER FOR REMAND
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby ORDERS that this case be
remanded to the agency for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will offer Plaintiff the
opportunity for a new hearing, take any further action needed to complete the administrative
record, and issue a new decision. The ALJ will further evaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional
capacity; re-evaluate the medical opinions; and, if warranted, obtain supplemental testimony
from a vocational expert.
After judgment, Plaintiff may be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant
to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August 2024.
/s/ Youlee Yim You
____________________________________
HON. YOULEE YIM YOU
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Submitted by:
NATALIE K. WIGHT, OSB #035576
United States Attorney
Page 1 ORDER OF REMAND - [6:24-CV-00154-YY]
District of Oregon
KEVIN DANIELSON, OSB #065860
Executive Assistant United States Attorney
1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600
Portland, OR 97201-2902
Telephone: (503) 727-1021
Fax: (503) 727-1117
kevin.c.danielson@usdoj.gov
DENNIS A. GOLDEN, KS #23920
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of Program Litigation, Office 4
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: (816) 936-4904
dennis.golden@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Page 2 ORDER OF REMAND - [6:24-CV-00154-YY]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?