Garner v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
32
ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 29 . Signed on 1/3/2025 by Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman. (ecp)
Alan Stuart Graf, OSB # 92317
alanstuartgraf@gmail.com
825 Merrimon Ave, Ste. C
PMB # 354
Asheville, NC 28804
Telephone: 931-231-4119
Fax: 931-964-3127
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MATTHEW G.
Plaintiff,
v.
6:24-CV-00385-HL
ORDER FOR EAJA
ATTORNEY FEES
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff is here by awarded $5,000.00 in fees
under the EAJA. Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded
by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program
(31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to Plaintiff and
not to Plaintiff’ s attorney. If, after receiving the Court’ s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1)
determines that Plaintiff has assigned his right to EAJA fees to his attorney; (2) determines that
Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3)
agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made
payable to Plaintiff’ s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset
Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act,
and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but
delivered to Plaintiff’ s attorney at the following address: Alan Stuart Graf, Attorney, 825
Merrimon Ave, Ste C, PMB # 354, Asheville, NC 28804.
ORDER FOR EAJA FEES-1
It is so ORDERED
-
- kt
Dated this 3 , day of January, 2025
-
United States Magistrate Judge
Prepared as to form
/s/ Alan Graf
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER FOR EAJA FEES-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?