MATHIS, et al v. RYAN, et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FRCP 60(b)(6) (DOC. NO. 18) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD THAT PETITIONER PRO SE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 17) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/30/13. 10/1/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) Modified on 10/1/2013 (afm, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS BRADY MATHIS,
Petitioner
vs.
SUPERINTENDENT
JOSEPH M. RYAN, et al.,
Respondents

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 90-3467

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th

day of September, 2013, upon consideration of the

petitioner’s pro se motion for relief pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure (Document #18), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED in
its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s pro se motion to proceed in
forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel (Document #17) is DENIED as moot.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.