PIRELA v. VAUGHN, et al

Filing 168

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/2/14. 4/3/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SIMON PIRELA, a/k/a SALVATORE
MORALES,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 90-5013

Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER MARTIN HORN, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of April 2014, upon consideration of the Third Amended
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 116), Appendix to the Petition (Doc. No. 117),
Response to the Petition with accompanying exhibits (Doc. No. 132), Reply Memorandum in
Support of the Petition (Doc. No. 141), the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. No. 145), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 151), the
Response in Opposition to the Objections (Doc. No. 156), Petitioner’s Reply in Further Support
of the Objections (Doc. No. 157), the Court’s prior Opinion and Order (Doc. Nos. 158-59),
Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 165), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No.
166), the pertinent state court record, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this
day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Motion for Reconsideration of Petitioner (Doc. No. 165) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.