WHITE v. VAUGHN, et al
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DENYING SECTION 2254 HABEAS CORPUS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60 F.R.CIV.P. IS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/7/18. 2/8/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD VAUGHN, et al.
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner Michael
White’s “Independent Action for Relief from Order Denying Section 2254 Habeas Corpus or,
alternatively, for relief under Rule 60 F.R.Civ.P.” (Docket No. 28), and all documents filed in
connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion is DISMISSED IN PART and DENIED IN
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?