WHITE v. VAUGHN, et al

Filing 33

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER DENYING SECTION 2254 HABEAS CORPUS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60 F.R.CIV.P. IS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/7/18. 2/8/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL WHITE
v.
DONALD VAUGHN, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 94-6598

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Petitioner Michael
White’s “Independent Action for Relief from Order Denying Section 2254 Habeas Corpus or,
alternatively, for relief under Rule 60 F.R.Civ.P.” (Docket No. 28), and all documents filed in
connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion is DISMISSED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.