BOCELLI v. VAUGHN, et al

Filing 45

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER CHRISTOPHER BOCELLIS MOTION FOR A RULE 60(B)(6) (ECF NO. 21), THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTYS RESPONSE (ECF NO. 32), PETITIONERS REPLY (ECF NO. 41), THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED THERETO, AND FOR THE REASO NS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A RULE 60(B)(6) (ECF NO. 21) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 11/26/24. 11/26/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER BOCELLI,
Petitioner,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT
DONALD T. VAUGHN, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 97-cv-02204

ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of November 2024, upon consideration of Petitioner
Christopher Bocelli’s Motion for a Rule 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 21), the District Attorney of Chester
County’s Response (ECF No. 32), Petitioner’s Reply (ECF No. 41), the exhibits attached thereto,
and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion for a Rule 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.
2. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue.
3. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Chad F. Kenney
CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE