BOCELLI v. VAUGHN, et al
Filing 45
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER CHRISTOPHER BOCELLIS MOTION FOR A RULE 60(B)(6) (ECF NO. 21), THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTYS RESPONSE (ECF NO. 32), PETITIONERS REPLY (ECF NO. 41), THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED THERETO, AND FOR THE REASO NS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A RULE 60(B)(6) (ECF NO. 21) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 11/26/24. 11/26/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.