BOCELLI v. VAUGHN, et al

Filing 45

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONER CHRISTOPHER BOCELLIS MOTION FOR A RULE 60(B)(6) (ECF NO. 21), THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTYS RESPONSE (ECF NO. 32), PETITIONERS REPLY (ECF NO. 41), THE EXHIBITS ATTACHED THERETO, AND FOR THE REASO NS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A RULE 60(B)(6) (ECF NO. 21) IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 11/26/24. 11/26/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(bw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTOPHER BOCELLI, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT DONALD T. VAUGHN, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-cv-02204 ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of November 2024, upon consideration of Petitioner Christopher Bocelli’s Motion for a Rule 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 21), the District Attorney of Chester County’s Response (ECF No. 32), Petitioner’s Reply (ECF No. 41), the exhibits attached thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for a Rule 60(b)(6) (ECF No. 21) is DENIED. 2. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue. 3. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: /s/ Chad F. Kenney CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?