STOKES v. THE DIST. ATTY. PHIL, et al

Filing 30

ORDER THAT: PETITIONER'S MOTION IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE BECUASE REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD NOT DEBATE THE CORRECTNESS OF THIS PROCEDURAL RULING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/29/13. 1/29/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIE STOKES,

:
Petitioner
:
:
v.
:
:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE
:
COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
:
Respondents :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 98-5182

ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2013, upon consideration of Petitioner’s
Motion for Relief From Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Document
No. 27), it is ORDERED that:
1.

Petitioner’s motion is DENIED;

2.

A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists

would not debate the correctness of this procedural ruling.

/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.