STOKES v. THE DIST. ATTY. PHIL, et al
ORDER THAT: PETITIONER'S MOTION IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE BECUASE REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD NOT DEBATE THE CORRECTNESS OF THIS PROCEDURAL RULING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/29/13. 1/29/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE
COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 98-5182
AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2013, upon consideration of Petitioner’s
Motion for Relief From Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Document
No. 27), it is ORDERED that:
Petitioner’s motion is DENIED;
A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists
would not debate the correctness of this procedural ruling.
/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?