MERCADO v. VAUGHN, et al

Filing 32

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITIONER'S MOTION FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 60(b) OF THE F.R.C.P. 27 , IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD 29 IS GRANTED NUMC PRO TUNC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/22/16. 3/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND ATTY'S.(gs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD MERCADO,
Petitioner
vs.
DONALD T. VAUGHN, et al.,
Respondents

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 99-2355

ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March 2016, upon consideration of the petitioner’s
motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Document
#27), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for leave to expand the
record (Document #29) is GRANTED numc pro tunc.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.